Vick averts a suspension from Goodell
Was this the right decision?
drttcd@gmail.com •
View all articles by Dexter Rogers, BASN Staff Reporter
POSTED: Jul 28, 2010
Email • Print • Discuss • Digg this story! •
![]() |
A month ago Vick held a birthday party in Virginia that was open to the public. Quanis Phillips was shot outside the party
minutes after Vick departed. It was proclaimed at the beginning of the investigation Vick was not a “person of interest” in the
shooting.
As details began to unravel
there were inconsistencies as to when Vick actually left the party. Later it was revealed he was involved in an
altercation of some sort. But after the
dust settled Vick wasn’t charged with any wrong-doing and now Goodell proclaims
he won’t be punished.
Should Vick have been
suspended by Goodell?
Vick issued the following: “I
knew the facts. I knew I didn’t do
anything wrong.” But he also added, “I
know I’m on thin ice.”Some like ESPN’s Skip Bayless
suggests Goodell should have suspended Vick “for one game.” Bayless believes Goodell was “soft” in his
handling of Vick.
Vick is under a strict “zero-tolerance” policy. His actions on
and off the field have been strictly monitored. Any likely infraction could
result in a severe suspension or possible banishment from the NFL.
Vick wasn’t charged or
convicted of a crime. Both the police
investigation and the internal investigation by the NFL revealed Vick wasn’t
guilty of any wrong-doing.
The only thing Vick did wrong
was be a high-profile celebrity athlete with a noted history holding a party
open to the public. The party should
have been private with bodyguards.
Even though Vick evaded
disciplinary action a negative stage has been set. An atmosphere has been created that ensures
if Vick does anything remotely out of line he’ll be subject to suspension,
being cut, or banned from the NFL.
The media contingent in Philadelphia and otherwise who want Vick to fail are waiting with
pens in hand to write aggregate stories clamoring for Vick to be sent
packing.
They are waiting for anything
that can be construed as negative so they can blow it out of proportion and
induce discipline in the court of mainstream media. I’d also venture to say some of negative press is racially motivated.
I’m surprised Vick didn’t get
disciplined even though he did nothing wrong.
History suggests rules are at times altered and manufactured to bring
about a particular ruling.
In society
all one has to do is study the historical development of this country and in
the realm of sports study what happened to African-American jockeys in the Kentucky Derby.
Sometimes individuals are
held responsible in the future for what they did in the past. Many want to judge Vick for what he did to
dogs as a convicted felon instead of viewing what he’s doing as a member of the
Philadelphia Eagles.
Translation: Let the man move
on with his life.
Bottom line: Michael Vick
needs to play well and monitor what he does on and off the field. Vick should now understand more than ever
that there are some in the media and otherwise who want to see him fail.
He must be strong enough to focus on doing the right thing and not position himself for potential trouble.Rest assured, those in the media who want to see him fail will be eagerly waiting with pens in hand waiting to assassinate his character.
![]() |
Email • Print • Discuss • Digg this story!•


