|
BlackAthlete Sports Network-www.blackathlete.net Football
NOTE: The current controversy between the NFL Players Association and some of its veteran members has been an on-going story that BASN has chronicled over the last year. This story written by Greg Moore first appeared on August 18, 2006 and the feelings represented in the piece are still echoed today by many NFLPA veterans.
You find out that so-called pension plan that will help you live comfortably for years to come is worthless by the cost of living standards of today. The retirement fund that allowed you to "dip" in early, penalized you for doing so and literally has you on the bread line.
And to make matters worse, the current employees of the company you helped build, the very ones who are making great salaries now because of your hard work, don't care about you or any of your co-workers because you are not a part of the family anymore.
Finally to add insult to your financial injury, the current "union" chief at the company was a co-worker of yours back in the day and he has literally turned his back on you and his former co-workers saying that it's his job to help the current workforce; not to strengthen a workforce long since aged. Would you want to work for a company like that?
We are talking about former AFL stars that helped shape that league and then go on to be successful in the NFL as well. We are talking about even players of at least the last fifteen years who are now understanding that a union that they once loved is so heartless, so callous in its thinking, that many of these former players are totally embarrassed how guys before them are even treated.
Joe Montana was quoted as saying, "The NFL is the worst represented league, on the players' side, in pro sports". These are former players that many of us can recognize off the bat. Yet for this story, I contacted several former players via e-mail correspondence and many of them were kind enough to send back interview questionnaires that depicted their plight in a small, compact form.
While the sampling may not be as in depth as I could get it, the former players who did send in answers were very clear about one thing; the union doesn't care about former players. Some players were Hall of Famers who are receiving paltry sums from the league's so-called pension plan that was revamped back in 1993.
The first d-back to return seven interceptions for TDs, set the record in 1969 with a pick and return for 80 yds against the Atlanta Falcons. The 7 TDs are still a Packer record and it means that I scored more points on defense than anyone in Packer history. [42] The first player to score on defense in Super Bowl history, 60 yds against the Raiders in Super Bowl II.
The first player to start for two different teams in the Super Bowl, and receive rings from two teams, the Packers in I & II and the Cowboys in Super Bowl VI. Played on six NFL Championship teams, five with the Packers and one with the Cowboys [1971] Played in four of the first six Super Bowls.
Questionnaire after questionnaire from the sampling continues to confirm what Long and Montana have already said in the Observer story; the current union doesn't give a rat's ass about those who came before them and put the league on the map. As I read each questionnaire that came across my e-mail, some of them were so heart wrenching that it really made me wonder whether or not Gene Upshaw, the executive director of players' union, truly understands just what kind of dire straits many of these former players are in.
Yet the words that come back and haunt Upshaw isn't anything he may say here or to any other media forum. It's the words that he has uttered to the press back in January and it is those same words that have many of these former players irate with their once reverenced colleague of an age gone by: "The bottom line is I don't work for them. They don't hire me and they can't fire me. They can complain about me all day long. They can have their opinion. But the active players have the vote. That's who pays my salary".
Despite what has now become a glamorous lifestyle portrayed by today's media, if you talk to many of these former players, they will tell you that their football salary was not enough to sustain their households. The median for a player who was playing in the 1960s, a salary of $15,000 wasn't uncommon.
Up until the mid 1970s, salary ranges of $20,000 to about maybe $60,000 were usually the norm for these players. Reports from various news entities say that maybe thirty years ago the average salary was $30,000. Yet for many of these players, it still took a second job for many of these players to survive and run their households.
It is the simple fact that for many of these players, playing in the NFL was a labor of love, not necessity that had them playing the game. So it is very disingenuous for someone in Upshaw's position to simply blow them off when serious concerns are being addressed in regards to financial compensation for "a job well done"..
Upshaw and others believe that the league and the union are doing a tremendous job for these former players but the reality is that these players do not have a solid foundation of a pension that grows according to the economy of the league or the cost of living range that is not present in today's times.
Typically you would want your pension plan to be adequate enough to handle such economic fluxes but for these players, especially the 325 members who are getting the sub par payments, trying to find a pension fund that current players can contribute into to help these former players is very feasible; especially since many believe the current fund is under funded.
The Social Security Election was an ill-advised provision that defeated the concept of what a pension plan is to achieve: security in retirement; 2) The transition from football to a post-career is often difficult; 3) Many, if not most, of the Group made their election because of financial hardships that come with divorce, illness (chronic illness of my wife), need for extra money to meet obligations (Herb Adderley: college education for children), job loss, and mistake (my Charger teammate, Paul Lowe, thought that his pension would be reduced by $50.00, not become $50.00); and 4) The past pension increases were designed to improve the retirement income of all retired players; yet, the members of the Group were left behind.
Many players like Adderley understand what they did in taking the election, but believe that had they not, then things would have been different.
DECENT MEDICAL AT THE FOUNDATION OF THEIR COMPLAINTS
The fact that current union chief has no regard for the plight that his former playing colleagues are facing today should serve as a testament as to how the entire league feels about these players. Despite a better retirement system that pays retirees fairly for their service, many former NFL players believe that if the league had a medical plan that covered them once they left; things could be better for many of them.
Edwards' situation rings home to Americans who are facing a similar plight when it comes to his health care issues; something that millions of Americans hope would be covered under their retirement plans.
These former players should be joined by players like Howie Long, Joe Montana and others and they should take this fight to Washington, D.C. This is indeed a fight that needs to be heard on Capitol Hill and there should be Congressional hearings on this matter and some type of investigation opened as to how a league that is making billions of dollars has the temerity to overlook past players and have employed a system of yes-men and women who would rather side with the league, the union and any entity that would systematically hamper retired players from having a decent living or having a better retirement than what they currently have.
There is a almost a unified sentiment from this group of players interviewed here and in many other stories that the current players and league officials simply do not care about what has happened to these players. The fact that current players simply "gloss" over these retired players' issues remains a bone of contention as to whether the league truly cares about its past heroes of the gridiron.
It's hard to imagine that 325 former NFL players would be in a situation that forces them to rely on a second or third income, or rely on health benefits of a spouse. For some of these players, including Hall of Famers, retirement hasn't been easy. Maybe what this story and others will do is help these players get the word out that their former employer has not been living up to the promises that it told these individuals.
Maybe what this story will do is get current and future players to realize that anything can happen and that one day this could be them; despite the millions of dollars that they are making.
These players gave their lives for the NFL and all they want is fair compensation. That is something that every American who has retired from a company wants and deserves. Above being a football player, these men were hard working Americans providing for the families. It's time for the league to recognize that fact and do the right thing by providing a pension plan that is befitting of its former gridiron gladiators. © Copyright 2005 by BlackAthlete Sports Network |


